Saturday, January 31, 2015

                                                             The Marne



As big and confused and drawn out as it was, the Battle of Tannenberg was a model of clarity and simplicity compared with the more famous Battle of the Marne, which has come down to us in history as the fight that saved Paris but in fact was settled by one side's decision not to fight.

Far more than Tannenberg, "First Marne"(there would be another huge and crucial encounter in almost exactly the same place four long years later) wasn't a single great encounter but a weeks-long series of maneuvers punctuated with bursts of ferocious combat. It involved millions rather than mere hundreds of thousands of troops, and they were stretched out over vast expanses of territory. Its starting date is hard to pinpoint; traditionally it has been placed on or about September 5th, but events began flowing toward it during the closing days of August, at the time when the Germans were destroying the Russian 2nd Army in East Prussia.

All the French and German forces, as August ended, were still arranged in the order in which they had begun the war. Kluck's 1st Army was still the outer edge of the Schleiffen right wing, but now it was well south of Belgium, setting the pace for the rest of the German line as it swung down toward Paris like a great hour hand in counterclockwise motion.

South of Verdun, the German left was also pushing toward Paris but making much slower progress. In place after place there, in woods and fields and on stony hilltops, men were dying by the thousands in savage, obscure fights the names of which are almost completely forgotten today.

Movement had always been most pronounced at the other end of the line, where Lanrezac and the British Expeditionary Force were no longer even attempting to turn and fight. The situation north of Paris had become almost surreal; hundreds of thousands of weary French and British doggedly trudging southward, hundreds of thousands of equally weary Germans following in their tracks, and almost none of them doing any actual fighting. Looming over all was the idea of Paris, the supreme symbolic prize but also a great if dubiously prepared fortress with a 60-mile perimeter of defensive walls and artillery emplacements. Bulow, when he got there, was supposed to besiege it while Kluck went around. One question was whether Bulow could get there. Another was whether, having arrived, he could take the city. The Germans had encircled Paris in the Franco-Prussian War but failed to get inside.

Schlieffen had predicted that a decisive battle would take place on or about the 40th day after mobilization. As the 25th day arrived, then the 30th, mounting tension and the increasing exhaustion
of the troops as they drew closer to Paris made it seem that a climax of some kind had to be imminent.

The commanders on both sides had little reason to feel that they were in charge of, rather than reacting to, events. At German supreme headquarters, which had been moving westward in cautious steps from Berlin to Koblenz and then on to Luxembourg, the continuing progress of Kluck and Bulow was igniting celebration. Moltke did not join in. As his armies penetrated deeper into France, clashing with or pursuing the French according to what Joffre was ordering his generals to do on any given day, his contact with them became increasingly tenuous.(Radio was still a new and highly unreliable medium.) Keenly aware of his own blindness, under no illusions about his ability to direct the campaign with so little knowledge of what was happening at the front, Moltke became unwilling to issue orders. Expectations became cloudy, prediction impossible, every shred of information precious. Would Kluck, his army worn down and outrunning its lines of supply, really able to circle all the way around Paris and still remain capable of attacking the French? Or might the best chances now be in Alsace and Lorraine, where the French defenses were reported to be vulnerable?

Joffre, even he surrendered great expanses of countryside, was accomplishing important things. He was making it impossible for the Germans to close with his left and force it into a fight it had little chance of winning. And he was maintaining good order; his armies remained fully under control in conditions that could easily have produced chaos. They were staying in formation and following routes and timetables worked out by headquarters, their every move planned, coordinated, and carefully directed. But this couldn't continue.

Unless they were going to march past Paris and leave it to the Germans, at some point soon the French, and presumably the British, were going to have to stop and make a stand. When this was going to be possible, or where or even whether, remained unclear. The sphinx like Joffre was sharing his plans, if at this point he had any, with no one.

Lanrezac was daily more pessimistic. Sir John French, thinking it likely that France had already lost the war, was talking of saving his little army by pulling it out of the line, perhaps even taking it back to England. The only really aggressive commander remaining in the area was Kluck, but his aggressiveness was taking a heavy toll on his troops. They were now advancing an average of more than 20 miles daily, each man burdened with his 10 lb rifle and his 60 or more pounds of gear as the hot dry summer of 1914 blazed on. Often, at the end of a long day on the march, the men had to spread out across the countryside and forage for meat and the vegetables that were, providentially, being harvested in abundance at summer's end. As they moved 60 and then 80 miles beyond the farthest points that their railway support could reach support could reach their horses began to collapse, the problem of supply threatened to become unmanageable.

The German cavalry had difficulty operating in this country; rivers, canals, woods, and other obstructions slowed and complicated every foray. When horsemen closed with enemy troops, they found themselves no match for machined guns and magazine-fed rifles. The labor of constantly moving artillery, and with it 1000's of shells, was terrible and endless.

Things were little better for the French and British, but as they drew closer to Paris they were moving toward rather than away from supplies and reinforcements. They were able to make increased use of the railroad network centered on the capital. The city was seized in with fear. Politicians asked if Joffre intended to retreat forever, got no answer, and called for his dismissal. 

On Lanrezac's left the British were retreating so fast-the infantry given only 4 hours' rest in 24 hours, the cavalry even less-that the Germans no longer knew where they were or if they remained a factor that had to be reckoned with. In his haste, French left Lanrezac's flank once again exposed. But the Germans too were having a hard time keeping their armies aligned. Kluck was outrunning Bulow and beginning to realize that somewhere out in front of him-a juicily tempting target-was Lanrezac's naked flank. On August 27th he had received fresh instructions from Moltke reiterating that his mission continued to be what it had been from the beginning; to march around Paris and proceed from there to the east. By this time, however, Moltke was receiving sketchy reports of a buildup of forces near Paris. The activity being reported was the birth of the French 6th Army, which Joffre had let General Gallieni have for the defense of the capital. Moltke saw these new forces, correctly, as a threat to his right wing.

Accordingly, on August 28th he sent new instructions. Kluck was to stay not just in line with Bulow but slightly behind him-"in echelon" is the military term. But he neglected to say anything about the new threat from the direction of Paris, thus making it impossible for the 1st Army's commander to see how these new orders were necessary or even made sense. To put himself in echelon with Bulow, Kluck would have had to stop his advance for a day or more, perhaps even turn around. In doing so he would have thrown away his chance to hit Lanrezac, perhaps to start the unraveling of the French left, and possibly to win the war. He decided that if he continued to move forward but shifted toward southeast, he could fulfill the letter of his new orders, bring his army closer to where Bulow was heading if not literally to Bulow's side, and continue his pursuit. Destroying Lanrezac's army, or at a minimum pushing it eastward out of Bulow's path and away from Paris, would surely satisfy the spirit of his instructions even if it violated their letter. And so Kluck crossed the River Marne on September 3rd and pushed on. He felt free to do so because he was ignorant of one important fact and wrong about another; ignorant of the new French army taking shape to the west, wrong in believing that the mysterious disappearance of the British meant that the BEF was no longer an effective fighting force.

Among Joffre's problems, at this point, was getting the BEF back into the war. He needed the cooperation of Sir John French-something easier said than done, the British commander having decided that his allies weren't only unreliable but doomed. Joffre hoped that he could restore French's confidence, and make a try at blocking the German advance in the process, by having Lanrezac attack Bulow's army near the towns of St. Quentin and Guise. Learning that Lanrezac was unwilling, Joffre went to 5th Army headquarters and confronted his old friend in person. When Lanrezac continued to resist, Joffre threatened to dismiss him. "If you refuse to carry out my orders," Joffre was reported to have said, "I'll have you shot!"

Joffre went next to the BEF's headquarters at Compiegne. There, in the grand chateau that had become a base of operations for the BEF's staff, he all but begged French to turn his army around, assuring him that in doing so he would be protected by Lanrezac on his right and by the new 6th Army on his left. French refused. He said that the sorry state of his army left him with no choice but to take it south of Paris for at least 10 days of refitting and recuperation.

Lanrezac's attack had begun, meanwhile, and quickly developed into a hard fight. The French were soundly whipped on their left; Lanrezac had again been correct in warning that the German 2nd Army would overwhelm them there. But on the right, at Guise, the battle seesawed inconclusively and the French were able to hold. At one critical point their position was saved when the dashing



                                                           General Louis Franchet d'Esperey

a flamboyant character whom the admiring British troops called Desperate Frankie, led an almost theatrical counterattack on horseback, his sword held aloft, accompanied by unfurled regimental banners and a band playing "La Marseillaise." The other side had its moment of glory after the Prussian First Foot Guards, as elite a unit as any in the armies of Germany, was thrown back and seemed in danger of falling apart. 


                                                              Prince Eitel Friedrich

The 2nd of Kaiser Wilhelm's 6 sons, took command. Beating a drum, he rallied the troops and led them forward in a successful counterattack. The Prince survived, but his son of the commander of the guards corps was killed. Most of the generals on both sides were men in their 50's and 60's, and many had sons in uniform. As the fighting went on and losses continued to be heavy among junior officers responsible for leading attacks and organizing defenses, news that yet another general's son had been killed became almost commonplace.

At Guise, Lanrezac found himself with both flanks so dangerously exposed that he had no choice but to withdraw. Bulow, though he declared victory in reporting to Moltke, had taken heavy casualties. He decided that he had to stop for a day. He asked Kluck to move closer-farther east-to support him. Kluck, hungrier than ever for Lanrezac's flank, agreed. Joffre had had no choice but to accept Lanrezac's decision to resume his retreat. Without the BEF he lacked the manpower to make a stand, as desperately necessary as a stand of some kind was beginning to be.

French, no doubt, was guided in his obstinacy by the instructions he had received from Kitchener before leaving England;  to regard his army as independent of the French and to protect it from destruction. Despite his concerns, however, the condition of the BEF was something short of desperate. The corps commanded by Smtih-Dorrien, having borne the brunt at Mons and Le Cateau, was indeed no longer fully functional. But the other corps, the one commanded by Haig, had still seen little hard fighting. Haig had, in fact, agreed to an appeal from Lanrezac to move his corps north to join in the fight at Guise, but before he could act he was countermanded by French. This had deepened Lanrezac's sense of betrayal.

In his reports to London, the BEF's commander had much to say about his lack of confidence in the French but little about his own movements and plans. It was only obliquely, from other sources, that the cabinet learned that he had denied Joffre's urgent request for help, that he had decided to move behind Paris, and that he was even considering a withdrawal to the coast. Kitchener sent a wire asking him to explain. When French replied that he was indeed withdrawing south of the River Seine and that "my confidence in the ability of the leaders of the French Army to carry this campaign to a successful conclusion is fast waning," Kitchener shot back another message informing him that he was expected to "as far as possible conform to the plans of General Joffre for the conduct of the campaign." In response, French again gave vent to his disdain for his allies and emphasized how unready the BEF was to withstand further combat. It may have been the haughtiness of his tone-"I think you had better trust me to watch the situation and act according to circumstances"-that prompted Kitchener to don his field marshal's uniform and cross the Channel by destroyer that night.

The next afternoon Kitchener, French, and Joffre met at the British embassy in Paris. Joffre told the Englishmen that with trainloads of troops pouring in from the east, he now had two armies in formation-not only the 6th at Paris but also a new 8th, which was to be inserted immediately east of the 5th. The Germans, he said, were probably unaware of these new units, and almost certainly couldn't know that a new French army now lay on their right. Thus it might now be possible to turn the tables-if the BEF would come forward. French argued, complained, and resisted. As he would acknowledge in his postwar memoir, he not only had no confidence in his allies but was deeply offended by Kitchener's sudden appearance in France. He thought that His Lordship was undercutting him with the impossible French and insulting him by wearing his uniform rather than attire appropriate to what he now was; a representative not of His Majesty's army but of the government. Kitchener too French into a separate room. It's not clear what was said there. French's account states that he put Kitchener in his place in no uncertain terms, but the aftermath of the conversation makes that unlikely. When the 2 men emerged, there was no further need for discussion. French was prepared to take the BEF north.

Joffre went to 5th Army headquarters, took his old friend Lanrezac off for a stroll in a nearby schoolyard, and there relieved him of his command. Lanrezac may have saved France by first to understand what the Germans were planning in Belgium, by putting his army in the path of the Schlieffen right wing, and by being the only army commander unwilling to sacrifice his troops in futile attacks. He had absorbed blow after blow from the invaders, performing well Charleroi and Guise and keeping his army in good order through its long retreat. But now he had become expendable. Was he, as Joffre would claim, too worn down to remain capable of acting decisively? Or was Joffre unable to forgive subordinates who disagreed with him and turned out to be right? It hardly mattered. What did matter was that Lanrezac hated Sir John French and French hated him. Joffre was determined to do everything possible to satisfy the British. Lanrezac's successor was obvious;


                                                     Franchet d'Esperey, Desperate Frankie
a particular favorite of the BEF.

Farther to the east, the front was aflame. Moltke was hurling his 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th, and 7th Armies against the French 4th, 3rd, 2nd, and 1st. The Germans were repulsed, fell back, and were counterattacked in their turn. Joffre by this point was firing generals almost wholesale; by September 6th he would replace the commanders of 2 of his original 5 armies, 7 corps, and 20 infantry and 4 cavalry divisions. Other officers were rising to fill vacancies. 


                                                                Ferdinand Foch
after performing well as corps commander in Lorraine at the start of the war and heroically during the retreat that followed, was promoted to command of the new 9th Army. 


                                                            Henri Philippe Petain
whose brigade had distinguished itself as part of Lanrezac's command in early fighting in Belgium, was given a division.

Uncertainty gave way to panic. The government left Paris for Bordeaux on the Atlantic Coast. But in the midst of it all Joffre remained impassive, maddeningly silent, calm. No matter how alarming the situation, how terrible the emergency, the tall and rotund generalissimo never seemed disturbed. He became famous for the care he took always to have a good lunch followed by a nap, end the day with a good dinner, and always get a full night's sleep(in bed at 9, back at work at 5). Even when things seemed to be at their worst, he made his staff understand that under no circumstances was his rest to be disturbed. But between mealtimes and bedtimes he was steadily on the move, using a big touring car driven by a Grand Prix racing champion to make repeated visits to his generals, especially those on the left. Thus he was able to keep himself in touch with events and observe his subordinates in action. He said so little during his visits, has so little to say even when told of shocking events or asked for guidance, that some of the men who dealt with him decided that he was little better than a stately idiot and that his principal contribution was his tranquilizing example. He has also been described as viciously political and self-serving behind his rock like exterior. He has been accused of dismissing subordinates not so much for failure to perform as for becoming potential rivals or, worst of all, for showing their chief to have been wrong.

But fools rarely succeed under the kinds of circumstances confronting Joffre, and it wasn't by accident that things began to turn his way. The decision to strip troops from his embattled right wing and send them west by rail was his, and the consequences couldn't have been more important. The number of divisions facing the German right, 17 and a half on August 23rd, rose to 41 by September 6th. In his way, gradually, Joffre gave himself one of the greatest advantages a general can have; superior mass. He magnified the significance of what has to be considered Moltke's most grievous mistake; his incremental removal of nearly a quarter of a million men from the right wing, which was left without enough divisions to do all the things needing to be done.

Thus the great strike force that had obsessed Schlieffen literally to his dying breath found itself outnumbered. It was also enfeebled; bone tired, short of supplies, and increasingly without food. It is possible that Moltke's greatest mistake was in sending reinforcements to his left, which was in no danger, and accomplishing little of importance, instead of to Kluck and Bulow, where they might have made all the difference. Apparently he was discouraged from doing so by the Belgians' destruction of key railways.

The French, in contrast to the Germans, were reaping all the benefits of fighting on home ground with interior lines of communication. Every 24 hours another 32 trains arrived at the capital loaded with troops and guns from the east. Even now, however, Joffre could find no way of stopping the Great Retreat. He continued to wait and watch. "A natural reluctance to abandon even provisionally more of our own territory," he wrote to the minister of war as late as September 3rd, "must not make us engage too early in general battle that might be launched in unpropitious circumstances."

Moltke now made a change of strategy so far-reaching that it amounted to the end of the Schlieffen Plan. Kluck and Bulow were told to advance. They were to stand in place and face west against whatever forces the enemy was mustering near Paris. All the German armies were to return to the attack. The 3rd Army was to fight its way southward to the River Seine. The 4th and 5th were to advance west of Verdun, the 6th and 7th to force a crossing of the Moselle River. The goal of this last two pairs of armies was to break through on their respective fronts, link up, and so encircle the entire French right in the area around Verdun. Never in history had there been an encirclement on such a scale; it would dwarf Tannenberg. There was no way of being confident that such a thing was possible. The irony of this sudden and drastic shift was that its success would depend on the ability of the German left wing to get past the very fortifications whose strength had made the Schlieffen Plan seem necessary in the 1st place.

It's difficult to judge whether Moltke's change of thinking was rooted in a genuine expectation of success or a desperate sense that his right wing was doomed to failure. It's certain that he did not believe the triumphal reports that continued to arrive at his headquarters and cause his staff to rejoice. "We must not deceive ourselves," he told a member of the German government. "We have had successes, but we have not had victory. Victory means annihilation of the enemy's power of resistance. When armies of millions of men are opposed, the victor has prisoners. Where are ours?...The relatively small number of captured guns shows me that the French have withdrawn in good order and according to plan. The hardest work is still to be done." 

As remote as he was from the action, as inadequate as knowledge of the situation on the ground was, his intuition was sound.



Tuesday, January 20, 2015

                                                 The Junkers


IT IS PART OF THE STRANGE DARK POETRY OF THE GREAT WAR

that the battle of Tannenberg, the most dramatic and complete victory achieved by either side in more than 4 years of bloody struggle, was fought in East Prussia. 

This was sacred ground. Though the most remote and least developed region of the German federation-so remote that in 1914 it lay north of Russian Poland and today it is part of Poland-East Prussia was in a sense the heart of the Hohenzollern empire. It was the ancient home of a collection of families who were neither conspicuously wealthy nor particularly distinguished in any other way but regarded themselves as Germany's rightful leaders and were regarded as such by their king.

Hindenburg himself was a son of one of those families, which for him made the victory exquisitely sweet. He had saved the tabernacle from violation, overnight turning himself into a national idol. He had kept alive not only Germany's hopes of winning the war but his kinsmen's hope that their privileged place in the life of Germany wouldn't be lost, and that the weaknesses and contradictions of that special place-its absurdities, even-could continue to be ignored.

The Germany that Hindenburg and his kind dominated had come a long way since the Franco-Prussian War. Long regarded as the land of musicians and dreamy philosophers and Black Forest Elves, by 1914 it was the most modern, efficient, innovative, and powerful economy in Europe. Not only in industrial output but in science, even in the arts. Germany was a powerhouse. Militarily it was so strong that Britain, France, and Russia had good reason to fear that even in combination they might not be able to stand up against it. 

Politically, though, Germany was a kind of Rube Goldberg device. Its system of government hadn't evolved like those of Britain and France, hadn't been passed down from time immemorial like Russia's or gradually improvised like Vienna's. Instead it was the creation of one man,



                                                                Otto von Bismarck
                                                                Germany's Iron Chancellor
                                           "Preventive war is like committing suicide out of fear of death"

He had designed it not so much to help Germany become a modern state as to keep modernity at bay-while, not incidentally, concentrating as much power as possible in his own hands. Its deficiencies had been serious from the start, and they grew more serious as the years passed, the world changed, and the Bismarckin system failed to keep pace. By the 2nd decade of the 20th century, with Bismarck long dead, those deficiencies had become dangerous. Ultimately they would render the system incapable of functioning under the strain of the Great War.

The root of the problem was that the empire, when it was declared in the Hall of Mirrors at the Palace of Versailles in 1871, was completely dominated by Prussia, the most powerful of the German states and the one that had led the others to victory over France. Prussia King,



                                                                     Wilhelm I

was proclaimed the 1st kaiser by a jubilant crowd of sword-brandishing princes and generals. It's not possible to understand the peculiar nature of Prussia, or why Prussia would ultimately not only fail but pass out of existence, without understanding what Wilhelm meant when he said that the creation of the new empire felt like a kind of death-that the day it happened was the most miserable of his life.

What he feared was the disappearance of "the old Prussia," a thing that since the Middle Ages had come to be holy not only to his Hohenzollern ancestors but to the kingdom's landholding gentry. The old Prussia was a place like no other in Europe, and its people were like no other. It arose in what is now northern Poland, east of where the Vistula River runs northward into the Baltic Sea, and originally it was the homeland not of Germans but of Slavs. In the 13th century the



                                                            Teutonic Knights

an order of religious warriors created to participate in the Crusades, were invited to help ambitious German nobles seize the territories around the Vistula. The area east of the river was taken from Slavic tribe called the Prussians, who disappeared from history but left their name to be picked up by the early Hohenzollerns when they needed something to call the insignificant little quasi-kingdom that the Holy Roman emperor permitted them to establish on the outermost fringe of the German world. 

Though the Teutonic Knights tried to recruit Germans to settle east of the Vistula, the soil was to poor and the climate too dank to be powerfully attractive. The Slavs were permitted to remain if they converted to Christianity. Gradually, as the generations passed, German and Slavic families intermarried and gave rise to an ethnically mixed local aristocracy that came to be known as the Junkers. The irony is that when Prussia became dominant in Germany and Prussia's military might made Germany one of the Great Powers of Europe, the world saw this half-Slavic Junker elite as the most Germanic of Germans. Some of the most Prussian of the Prussian-for example



                                                          Karl von Clausewitz

who wrote the classic On War-bore names that were Slavic in origin.

The Junkers weren't, as a group, rich, and their estates weren't large. Life was often almost hardscrabble, requiring much labor and generating barely enough income to sustain a marginally aristocratic way of life. The people who grew up on those estates were, as a rule, neither particularly sophisticated. They were pious and provincial Lutherans, upright and sober, hardworking and hardheaded and often hard-hearted, with a deeply ingrained reverence for the law, for property rights, and for the class structure atop which they sat. What came to distinguish them above all was their almost mystic bond not to Prussia as a nation but to the Hohenzollern dynasty. This bond developed slowly, and what made it develop was the advantage if offered the Junkers. In return for their loyalty, they were assured nearly exclusive access to the more coveted positions in the Prussian army and civil service-opportunities for their sons to win a measure of power, snatches of glory, and sometimes, though not commonly, real wealth. 

The Junkers evolved into Prussia's hereditary military elite. A culture emerged that was unlike any other in Europe, and army, it was said, that happened to have a country attached to it. This arrangement was threatened by the Napoleonic wars at the start of the 19th century and by the revolution that shook Europe in 1848.




                                                Prussian King Frederick William IV
horrified the Junkers by granting the revolutionaries a constitution, though this was rescinded at the 1st opportunity.


Having barley survived these upheavals, the Junkers emerged more conservative than ever, their hatred of change in any form deeply ingrained.

Kaiser Wilhelm I wasn't a man of great intellect, but it was perceptive of him to find little to celebrate in the creation of his empire. In the most visible ways, the empire was a glorious achievement, one that put him at the pinnacle not only of Germany but of Europe and appeared to multiply the opportunities available to the Junker elite. But on a deeper level the new situation was fraught with difficulties, especially for the Junkers. 1st among the problems was the question of legitimacy. The Junkers were determined to maintain their special connection to the crown and the prerogatives that came with it.

The Hohenzollern dynasty wanted much the same thing. But if the Junkers had been a small slice of the population of Prussia, they were an even smaller part of the empire. In the new world of giant industries and great cities, they remained a tribe of provincial farmers without real economic power.

Inevitably, the Junkers came to seem an anachronism to the increasing numbers of Germans who knew how different things were in America, Britain, and France. As agriculture became a  less important element in the economy, what little prosperity the Junkers traditionally had came under threat. The richer and more educated the German nation grew, the more prominent among the peoples of the world, the odder it seemed that East Prussia should dominate as it did.

What is most odd is how little resistance to Junker privilege other Germans displayed during the half century that the empire existed. Bismarck, again, made this possible. Though he had deep roots in Junkerdom and for much of his early adulthood had worked a family farm, Bismarck was never entirely trusted or accepted by his own class. (His mother, and outsider from the professional classes, had given young Otto an education that made him more cosmopolitan than was considered quite proper.) He was permitted to create the empire only on the basis of certain understandings. He made it not a centralized country but a federation in which Bavaria, Baden, Wurttemberg, and other states were allowed semiautonomy under their ruling families while Prussia stood supreme.  He fashioned a constitution that concentrated nearly all political power in the hands of the monarch(who remained King of Prussia in addition to being Kaiser) and the officials he appointed. He did so with the tacit understanding that the Junkers would continue to be specially favored. And so they were. Though it would have been politically awkward to fill every important chair with Junker bottoms, the Junkers could always be confident of getting more than their statistically fair share. Bismarck's system made ample room for economic liberalism-that was good for revenues and so for the army-but made political liberalism, and above all democracy, impossible.

This wasn't a system well equipped to deal with the tensions of a modern capitalist and industrial society, and even Bismarck had trouble making it work. After he passed from the scene, his successors were sometimes barely able to keep its wheels turning. In a free market for agricultural products, the Junker estates would have sunk into bankruptcy; to save them, the government enacted so many tariffs on food imports that Germany became what has been described as a "welfare agency for needy landowners." There was a legislature, the Reichstag, but it had little power. As men infected with democratic and even socialist notions became increasingly common within the Reichstag, the Junkers kept them in check by joining forces with industrial interests in what came to be called the alliance of iron and rye. They were greatly helped by an electoral system that gave more votes to people with land and money. 

In consequence, 1000's of Germans of professional attainment, people with education and talent, had no real voice in public affairs. The political life of the nation remained in an atrophied state. The Reichstag, though it did have a role in budget-making, was otherwise little more than a debating society. In England and France the members of the legislature-The House of Commons and the Chamber of Deputies-chose the prime minister. Thus they, and the people who elected them, had a real connection to the levers of power and could regard themselves as a kind of ultimate authority. Their counterparts in Germany were essentially impotent. Their parties, instead of being contenders for control of the government, were held at arm's length by a government that remained very nearly what it had been in feudal times; a collection of Junkers chosen by their king. The result, in the short term, was widespread public indifference to politics. In tougher times it was a recipe for alienation.

The problem of how the Junkers were going to keep intact what remained of the old Prussia extended into the army. With all their limitations and faults, the Junkers were never expansionist imperialists. They weren't even German nationalists; many of them cared little about Germany except as an extension of Prussia power. What they wanted was the little world of their forebears, and every new stage of growth, of expansion, made that world less sustainable. Even the expansion of the army, unavoidable in the arms race that gripped the great powers of Europe at the start of the 20th, deeply troubled many traditionalists. Just as for a good Junker the only thoroughly acceptable army officer was an East Prussian of acceptable family background, so too the only dependable recruit was an ignorant and docile East Prussian farm boy. The increasing numbers of alternatives-growing hordes of city dwellers and factory workers, many of them infected with modern notions-were aliens and not to be trusted.

Tensions associated with such questions cost Erich Ludendorff, himself an upstart whose father had sold insurance, his place on Moltke's planning staff just a year before the start of the Great War. He had become convinced that a larger army was essential of the Schlieffen Plan was to remain practicable in the face of increasing French and Russian strength, and he began pressing for the creation of 6 new army corps. When only half this total was approved, he continued to demand more. After being told to keep silent but refusing, he was banished from the staff. This was a blow; it meant that, in case of war, Ludendorff wouldn't become Moltke's chief of operations. He had brought this punishment down on himself by touching 2 sets of raw nerves. The government and the army didn't want to stir up resistance in the Reichstag by asking for too big an increase in military spending too quickly. And many influential Junkers knew that it wouldn't be possible to find nearly enough young aristocrats to fill the officer billets in 6 new corps. Outsiders in large numbers would have to be given commissions. The biggest army that Germany was capable of mustering wasn't likely to be the kind of army that the Junkers could continue to control.


While Lundendorff departed Berlin for Dusseldorf and command of a nonelite regiment(his not being given a unit of the Prussian Guard was seen as another rebuke), the man who would become his archenemy was rising almost effortlessly. 4 years older than Lundendorff, Erich von Falkenhayn had been a favorite of Kaiser Wilhelm's since 1911, the year he had become a regimental commander in the guard. Just a year after that he was made a major general, and in 1913 he was promoted again and made minister of war. Though surprising even to his fellow generals, this rapid ascent(and still the greater promotion that would soon follow) is explicable in terms of Falkenhayn's background. He was very nearly the ideal Junker. Tall and slender, haughtily elegant in bearing, he had been raised on a modest farm in easternmost East Prussia to a family that traced itself back to the 20th century and the Teutonic Knights and had produced one of Frederick the Great's generals. He was a pure product of the old Prussia, and Ludendorff's opposite in far too many ways.